Physical attractiveness in dating

As I consider this approach to finding a mate, I am especially curious about those people who highly value their partner’s level of attractiveness but don’t themselves fall within the upper end of the attractiveness scale.Though physical attractiveness is subjective, there do seem to be some general standards most people agree upon, and most couples, it seems, are within a few levels of attractiveness of each other.So even though the “science behind love” doesn’t show that attractiveness is a quality that predicts and sustains happy, long-term relationships, why do some people use that criteria so soon in the evaluating process?Though this approach can work for some, if it hasn’t been particularly effective in the past, why continue to immediately evaluate your soul mate in this way?Your access to the NCBI website at gov has been temporarily blocked due to a possible misuse/abuse situation involving your site.

Keep looking and don’t settle for someone who doesn’t meet your standards!Previous studies have failed to find support for the hypothesis, derived from Level of Aspiration Theory, that individuals chose to date those whose “social desirability” level is similar to their own.In the present experiments, which were designed to test the matching hypothesis, the salience of possible rejection by the dating choice was varied.This research did not account for each individual's own looks. Research has shown that people have essentially universal standards of beauty, including large eyes, "baby face" features, symmetric faces, so-called average faces, and specific waist-hip ratios in men versus women.Ariely, Leonard Lee of Columbia University's Business School in New York, and their colleagues looked at information from an online dating Web site called HOTor NOT.com, which allows members to rate others on their physical attractiveness.

Leave a Reply